Big Bang - Fact or Fiction

The Big Bang Theory has some significant problems. First of all, the Big Bang Theory does not address the question: "Where did everything come from?" Can nothing explode? This contradicts to the:

1st Law of Thermodynamics (the Law of Conservation of Matter). Where did Space, Time, Matter, and Energy come from? Next, how did this explosion / "expansion" cause order while every explosion ever observed and documented in history caused only disorder and chaos?

2nd Law of Thermodynamics : Consequently, the Big Bang seemingly violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics (the Law of Increased Entropy). What organized the universe after the singularity?

Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum: Besides conflicting with the 1st and 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics, the Big Bang Theory contradicts the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum. For example, how does the Big Bang Theory explain "Retrograde Motion" (the backward spin of some planets and the backward orbits of some moons) without violating the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum?

Everything in the universe is spinning - planets, stars, galaxies, etc. It would take an enormous amount of energy to start a planet spinning. To solve this, advocates of the Big Bang Theory claim that the singularity that blew up in a sudden big bang was spinning before it exploded, thus everything within it was spinning as it flung out. The problem is Venus, Uranus, and Pluto are spinning backwards (Retrograde Motion). If something spinning clockwise blows up, all of the pieces will be spinning clockwise (the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum). The Big Bang explains Retrograde Motion as cosmic impacts on planets that have stopped and then reversed the spin. This is not acceptable, since many small impacts would be largely self-defeating, and the force of impact necessary to stop and reverse the spin of a planet all at once is incredible, so much so it would certainly leave a mark -- probably take a huge chunk out of the planet! At the very least, it would upset the orbit. Yet Venus has a retrograde spin and is nearly flawless in both its shape and orbit.

Besides the significant problem of retrograde spin, some natural satellites have a retrograde orbit around their planet. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune have satellites orbiting in both directions. Once again, how can Big Bang cosmologists solve this dilemma without violating the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum?

Also, the Big Bang Theory contradicts observed phenomena. For example, the Big Bang Theory is unable to explain uneven distribution of matter throughout the universe resulting in galactic "voids" and "clumps". If the Big Bang was true, all matter would be (roughly) evenly distributed.

In the universe, there are too many “large scale structures” to form in a time as short as 10-20 billion years, as suggested by the Big Bang Theory. Also, when observing globular clusters (groups of tens of thousands, to one million stars), they appear older than the universe, which falsifies the Big Bang Theory. Finally, there are contradictions between the Big Bang Theory, and thoughts of various religions.

Flatness: In the universe, according to Einstein’s equation, any deviation from flatness in an expanding universe filled with matter or radiation only gets bigger as the universe expands. So any tiny deviation from flatness at a much earlier time would have grown very large by now. If the deviation from flatness is very small now, there must have been an immeasurable small amount of deviation at the start of the Big Bang. Today, there is a very small amount of deviation from the flat spatial geometry. As there is a bit of spatial curvature, it signifies that there must have been an immeasurably small amount of curvature during the time that the Big Bang occurred. However, according to the Big Bang Theory, there was no deviation of spatial curvature, and thus contradicts the Big Bang Theory.

Horizon: Cosmic microwave backgrounds is the cooled remains of the radiation density from the radiation – dominated phase of the Big Bang. Observations of the cosmic microwave background show that it is incredibly smooth in all directions, and thus it is highly isotropic in thermal radiation. This temperature is at 2.73K (Kelvin). Radiation can be very uniform by the photons being mixed around a lot, or thermalized, through particle collisions. However, this is a problem in the Big Bang Theory, since photons cannot move information faster than the speed of light, but the photons cannot move across the universe in time to account for the observed isotropy in the thermal radiation. This contradicts the Big Bang, as there is equal distribution in thermal radiation.

Magnetic: According to relativity, the Big Bang would have needed to create lots of magnetic monopoles to create the results we see today. A magnetic monopole is like a magnet with only one pole. However, so far, physicists have been unable to find even one magnetic monopole. This gives questions on the Big Bang model to look for another explanation of what could have happened.

============================

If you can resolve the above conflicts, I will be more than happy to discuss more. As for now, I will just stick with the law "ADNH"

Xi xon

You understand nothing about physics. Pls come to UCI and take a course "Introduction to Modern Physics"!!! Many of my friends are teaching in Southern California, they can tutor you.

The ones proposing BB of course know Thermodynamics!!!

The Big Bang Theory has some significant problems. First of all, the Big Bang Theory does not address the question: "Where did everything come from?" Can nothing explode? This contradicts to the:

1st Law of Thermodynamics (the Law of Conservation of Matter). Where did Space, Time, Matter, and Energy come from? Next, how did this explosion / "expansion" cause order while every explosion ever observed and documented in history caused only disorder and chaos?

2nd Law of Thermodynamics : Consequently, the Big Bang seemingly violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics (the Law of Increased Entropy). What organized the universe after the singularity?

Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum: Besides conflicting with the 1st and 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics, the Big Bang Theory contradicts the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum. For example, how does the Big Bang Theory explain "Retrograde Motion" (the backward spin of some planets and the backward orbits of some moons) without violating the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum?

Everything in the universe is spinning - planets, stars, galaxies, etc. It would take an enormous amount of energy to start a planet spinning. To solve this, advocates of the Big Bang Theory claim that the singularity that blew up in a sudden big bang was spinning before it exploded, thus everything within it was spinning as it flung out. The problem is Venus, Uranus, and Pluto are spinning backwards (Retrograde Motion). If something spinning clockwise blows up, all of the pieces will be spinning clockwise (the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum). The Big Bang explains Retrograde Motion as cosmic impacts on planets that have stopped and then reversed the spin. This is not acceptable, since many small impacts would be largely self-defeating, and the force of impact necessary to stop and reverse the spin of a planet all at once is incredible, so much so it would certainly leave a mark -- probably take a huge chunk out of the planet! At the very least, it would upset the orbit. Yet Venus has a retrograde spin and is nearly flawless in both its shape and orbit.

Besides the significant problem of retrograde spin, some natural satellites have a retrograde orbit around their planet. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune have satellites orbiting in both directions. Once again, how can Big Bang cosmologists solve this dilemma without violating the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum?

Also, the Big Bang Theory contradicts observed phenomena. For example, the Big Bang Theory is unable to explain uneven distribution of matter throughout the universe resulting in galactic "voids" and "clumps". If the Big Bang was true, all matter would be (roughly) evenly distributed.

In the universe, there are too many “large scale structures” to form in a time as short as 10-20 billion years, as suggested by the Big Bang Theory. Also, when observing globular clusters (groups of tens of thousands, to one million stars), they appear older than the universe, which falsifies the Big Bang Theory. Finally, there are contradictions between the Big Bang Theory, and thoughts of various religions.

Flatness: In the universe, according to Einstein’s equation, any deviation from flatness in an expanding universe filled with matter or radiation only gets bigger as the universe expands. So any tiny deviation from flatness at a much earlier time would have grown very large by now. If the deviation from flatness is very small now, there must have been an immeasurable small amount of deviation at the start of the Big Bang. Today, there is a very small amount of deviation from the flat spatial geometry. As there is a bit of spatial curvature, it signifies that there must have been an immeasurably small amount of curvature during the time that the Big Bang occurred. However, according to the Big Bang Theory, there was no deviation of spatial curvature, and thus contradicts the Big Bang Theory.

Horizon: Cosmic microwave backgrounds is the cooled remains of the radiation density from the radiation – dominated phase of the Big Bang. Observations of the cosmic microwave background show that it is incredibly smooth in all directions, and thus it is highly isotropic in thermal radiation. This temperature is at 2.73K (Kelvin). Radiation can be very uniform by the photons being mixed around a lot, or thermalized, through particle collisions. However, this is a problem in the Big Bang Theory, since photons cannot move information faster than the speed of light, but the photons cannot move across the universe in time to account for the observed isotropy in the thermal radiation. This contradicts the Big Bang, as there is equal distribution in thermal radiation.

Magnetic: According to relativity, the Big Bang would have needed to create lots of magnetic monopoles to create the results we see today. A magnetic monopole is like a magnet with only one pole. However, so far, physicists have been unable to find even one magnetic monopole. This gives questions on the Big Bang model to look for another explanation of what could have happened.

============================

If you can resolve the above conflicts, I will be more than happy to discuss more. As for now, I will just stick with the law "ADNH"

Xi xon

And this is the answer

http://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/BTBB36.pdf

M Theory Model of a Big Crunch/Big Bang Transition

Anh Kakalotta,

Be careful what you are proposing. I might show up !!! hihihi

As for the M-theory, which attempts to unify the five separate super symmetry theories by using dualities, serves as a source of intrigue and skepticism. I learned that when I am still in kinder-garden. For your sake, I hope you don't fall for that crabs.

M-theory requires eleven dimensions (ten space dimensions and one time dimension) and incorporates numerous novel structures, such as two-dimensional membranes. Unfortunately, nobody is certain about the exact features of this eleven-dimensional space. Nobody, not even its creator Professor Edward Witten really knows about what is going on in these eleven dimensions. Are there only strings, only membranes, a combination of both, or even more structures involved? This nebulous understanding is a result of the mathematical incapability to express this whole new world.

In your previous post, you also mention the 11th dimension. I hope you didn't mean to refer to M-Theory. You are good with numbers, but compare to Bé Xí Xọn, you are not quite ready yet.

Don't get yourself burn !!!

Xí Xọn

Núi cao sẽ có núi cao hơn !!!

If you want to show up, feel free to do so.

Everything I said is conjecture, which is one of the frontier in human's understanding about Bigbang, okie?

I understand what I said. Don't try to attack bigbang with the tools and knowledge of "kinder Garden", girl. it's ridiculous. At least ten years of Education in top school like UC is required for you to do so.

I work with the short distant limit of that theory. I am at Cal, if you want, I can give you some education. Haha. Don't try to play with me, it's gonna be a joke.

If you could not even understand a page of the paper I gave you, then it's of no benefit to talk about BB with you.

You are a very brave girl. Good!

Anh Kakalotta,

First you said:

Many of my friends are teaching in Southern California, they can tutor you.

Now, you said:

I can give you some education

That's really funny !!! Either anh Kakalotta doesn't know Bé Xí Xọn, or you do have a good sense of humor. Go ahead, spend some of your free time asking others members about bé Xí Xọn, then come back here to chat with Bé and tell Bé if you are still qualify give bé some education on how anh Kalaotta teach me to fully constructing string perturbation theory around t = 0

Bé LinhNhi Xí Xọn

haha! By the way you talk about, bb, I can see quite clearly your level. So no need to ask! Haha. It'll be waste of time for me!

5 years more to talk with me. Go to get some more education!

OK ! We will try to chat again in 5 years. Hopefully, you will gain enough knowledge to attempt answering my first post, instead using some theory that have so many flaws.